If you are a new reader, you may be in for one hell of a shock.

No new reader will ever understand what this statement was really about.

The previous statement was obviously about cosmic psychic radar.  Is it not so?

This is fun.  Let’s scan some more new readers.  Let’s even scan ourselves.

Your body is now seeking a new definition of the human brain. Do you have one for it that it can agree with?

The human brain actually believes that it is the organ described by “scientific human brains” that have decided they are “objective”.  Through these “scientists”, the brain backs off and gets the objective view of itself.  The reader can really see the reader now.  Don’t you agree?

The layman reader of course may still unscientifically believe they are at least potentially a “conscious self.”  The scientific brain, however, has the objective view of the brain and must decree that notions of “consciousness” and “selfhood” are generated only in pathetically subjective brains.  There is according to Eliminative Materialism, no consciousness or selfhood as such.  However, these scientific brains still develop abstract ideas, use skilful concepts in publishing their “brilliant” papers and do not call themselves “this brain” or “that brain”. They even want to be emotionally praised by society as various egos treating the scientific brain as a very advanced and authoritative ego.  These brain-in-the-jar type readers just refuse to see the obvious.  That is indeed a sign of real lack of consciousness and genuine individuality.  Think about it.

If you are a truly conscious self, give yourself an internal comment on this note that proves it.

If you are not a mere brain machine, think something or do something completely out of your usual ruts before you read the next note.

Welcome to your new approach to this note.

Welcome to my new approach to the last note.

Welcome to your new approach to my new approach to this note.

Welcome to my new approach to your old approach to some note.

Picture a fucked-up reader stuck in their old approach to this note.

Decide what your real approach to this note is.

Review your approach to the last note as a clue about this note.

Is it possible that no limited approach to this note will reach it?

An unlimited approach to your approach to this note is not possible for you as such.

Some of our readers have gone completely transcendental, which means they would have almost understood Buddhism if they had remained to be? Buddhists.

Enough of your limited, egotistical reading of this final note!

Click Here for the NEXT SESSION

Click Here to Return to HOME PAGE